Entry tags:
Epic Fail
After having watched s2 and s3 of Dr. Who, I went to watch some vids. And look what I found.
At this URL, you'll find a very well cut Dr. Who vid to the Muse song "Feeling Good". If you haven't seen the s3 finale and don't want to be spoiled, you should probably not watch it. Anyway. I downloaded it, unpacked it and opened it in my player.
And this is what I found myself looking at.

Uh. What?
She has also put a watermark of her initials in the rest of the vid.

Newsflash for you, vidder: the footage you cut this vid from you used without permission. You stole it. You committed clip theft. What the hell are you on about?!
People like that piss me off to no end. I couldn't even enjoy the vid, which was a damn shame, because it was really a good vid. Is that just me?
At this URL, you'll find a very well cut Dr. Who vid to the Muse song "Feeling Good". If you haven't seen the s3 finale and don't want to be spoiled, you should probably not watch it. Anyway. I downloaded it, unpacked it and opened it in my player.
And this is what I found myself looking at.
Uh. What?
She has also put a watermark of her initials in the rest of the vid.
Newsflash for you, vidder: the footage you cut this vid from you used without permission. You stole it. You committed clip theft. What the hell are you on about?!
People like that piss me off to no end. I couldn't even enjoy the vid, which was a damn shame, because it was really a good vid. Is that just me?
no subject
It's the same fine line as fanfic, really (I don't own Enterprise, for example, but Miracle Worker
has my blood, sweat and tearsis mine all mine), only with vids it's a bit greyer around the edges.no subject
But the people who cut the Dr Who episodes, they didn't just set up a camera and let it run while the actors did their thing. They did essentially the same what vidders do - took footage and worked with it until it looked good/fit its purpose.
Just because the people who worked on the original clip aren't fandom vidders doesn't mean that they didn't put work and creativity into making and cutting the episode.
I'm not saying I approve of clip theft among vidders. I'm just saying that this person *points up* should be aware that the way she formulated her demands is completely ridiculous.
no subject
Well, yeah, which is a point I also wanted to make. There's asking people to not use your work, and then there's putting a huge neon sign over your vids reading MINE BITCHES.
no subject
no subject
Yeah. Just my two cents.
no subject
However, for me fandom is about sharing. Sharing your works with the others and trusting them to respect you as an artist. I know that not everybody in fandom does this, there is enough plagiarism to prove that, but I don't think that being aggressive about it and - as in this case - accusing people of the intention of clip theft per default is a solution. I think it rather aggravates the problem, because warnings like this create an atmosphere of unhealthy competition that I don't think we need in fandom, because we already have it everywhere else in life.
So, yeah, while I agree that clip theft and plagiarism should not be tolerated, and while I also agree that a small warning - for example as a part of the vidders' equivalent of the author's note - is completely acceptable, I don't think that aggressiveness of this kind is in any way helpful or justified.
no subject
no subject
I don't think fandom could exist without that trust, and that is why I don't think that not trusting - as this vidder is doing - is in any way helpful. I'm not saying that putting copyright info in the bottom of the page is awful and wrong. I myself always put my name on the websites I create, and of course I also name myself as an author of my fiction. What put me off about this vidder was that she is so extremely aggressive about it. It's one thing to mark something as your own, it's another thing to be insulting to the people you chose to share it with.
no subject
Yeah, she was. There are several posts in her LJ about this guy setting up a false youtube account based on her username and either uploading the vids as they were, or putting a blue bar over the watermark. Can't quite remember which.
no subject
She already did have the watermark then, though?
no subject
no subject
no subject