ext_25474 ([identity profile] debris_k.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] teyla 2008-11-07 10:14 pm (UTC)

er, yeah, editing since I saw your newly edited post

Yeah, but. Your post is still just as or more panic-raising than the one you linked to - if you know now what you didn't know then, could you at least please edit it?

Because I really like ljseek, as useless as it can sometimes be (read: more often than I'd like), and if there's a mass blocking of it on lj due to folks spreading false facts, I'll be one even more unhappier panda.

Because it's always that *one* author with that *one* story that has the search banned that I need to find in a clinch, or something, and, seriously? Let's just campaign against real informations abusers the likes of google or idiots like the lj PTB, but not half-decent if not particularly smart sites that try to make lj a more useable place.


Nevermind, you already did it. Sorry for the rant. Am not a happy panda today. grrrr stoopid lj design-blind team grrrr

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting